How it works

AI-assisted evidence gathering, human-audited judgment

The unit of analysis is the claim, never the student. Committees keep the judgment; we supply the evidence levels.

The process

Four steps from claim to report

Step 1 · Intake

Claims and evidence, structured

The student submits each activity with supporting evidence: links, documents, contacts, records. They select which claims to have verified; nothing is examined without their request.

Step 2 · Automated layer

Systematic checks at scale

Registry and database lookups, organization domain and email checks, document authenticity, cross-referencing of names, dates, titles and award levels, and anomaly flags for inconsistencies.

Step 3 · Human audit

Judgment where it is needed

Trained reviewers work a standardized rubric for inter-rater reliability. Every ambiguous claim gets human judgment in context, because titles like “founder” and “captain” mean different things in different places.

Step 4 · Tiered report

One page, claim by claim

Each verified claim carries an evidence tier and, where useful, suggested precise wording. The report is ready within 48 hours of submission, and you are emailed the moment it is available. You review it first and control whether and where it is sent.

The tiers

Five evidence levels, defined

Tiers describe the strength of available evidence for a specific claim. They are not judgments of character.

TierMeaning
VerifiedStrong independent evidence confirms the claim as stated.
SubstantiatedEvidence supports the claim, but it comes mostly from student-provided documents.
Partially verifiedThe core claim is true; scope, title, or impact is weaker or unclear.
UnverifiedNot enough evidence either way. A statement about evidence, not truth.
ContradictedAvailable evidence conflicts with the claim as worded.
Worked example · Claim

“Founded a nonprofit that tutored 500 low-income students.”

What verification found

Registered organization: confirmed. Founder role: confirmed. Program records support 180 students served. No independent source for the 500 figure.

Tier Partially verified
Your report

How to attach your report

Your report is ready within 48 hours of submission, and you are emailed the moment it is available. An expedited review, returned in under 8 hours, is available on request. The report reaches admissions offices in two forms, and you control both.

48hours
Your report inside the window, or it is free.
The PDF

Download and keep it

A one-page PDF, claim by claim with evidence tiers, downloadable from your account. Share it with counselors, scholarship programs, or anyone else you choose.

The unique link

Paste it into Additional Information

Every report comes with its own unique link. Paste it into the Additional Information section of your application. Anyone who clicks it sees your report as a live page on attested.education: nothing to attach, nothing that can be altered in transit.

The window

Valid for eight months

The link works for eight months from the day your report is issued, which covers the full application cycle it belongs to. After that it expires and the page comes down with it.

Scope

What we verify first

We begin with the claim types where exaggeration is easiest and verification matters most.

Awards & competitions

Placement, level, and selectivity, checked against organizers and public records.

Founder & nonprofit claims

Registration, role, duration, and the scale of activity the records actually support.

Research & publications

Venue, authorship, and the nature of the contribution.

Internships & work

Role, duration, and responsibilities, confirmed with the organization.

Quantified impact

“Served 5,000 people” type figures, traced to whatever records exist.

Informal & community work

An attestation channel for real work that produces no paperwork: caregiving, community roles, family obligations.

Design principles

Rules we hold ourselves to

No composite score

Tiers attach to claims, never to people. A single “honesty score” would punish students whose real work is informally documented, so we refuse to produce one.

“Unverified” is not “false”

We report the level to which a claim was substantiated by available evidence. We never assert that a student lied, and report language is designed around that discipline.

The student controls the report

Students see their report before anyone else, may appeal with further evidence, and decide whether and where it is sent.

Built to resist gaming

Independent corroboration outweighs self-supplied documents, single-source evidence that looks too clean gets flagged, and the rubric iterates against observed gaming, as in any serious fraud-detection system.